So over in the kindergarten they are blaming Kieran Trippier for us not winning yesterday and saying Kyle Walker would have made the difference. Is this worth thinking about? Well using the power of brain-thinking and looking back at last season's matches, OK a bit radical and I would never expect the numpties to do that, my opinion is no, that is not worth thinking about and is in fact bollocks.
In the last 6 wins of the season last year, Kieran played in 4 of them and Walker only 1. In fact the only game we lost in the run in happened when Walker was playing and we lost to West Ham So, how could we have won those games if Trippier was as shite as the numpties say? My theory is that they are silly pantyliners and are talking bollocks. I shall call this Dorset's Theory Of Numptyism.
As much as I like to blame Levy for everything because he is in fact a cunt, we can't really say that lack of investment is the reason we have had a bit of a slow start. The squad is almost exactly the same as last season and nobody was saying anything but 'oh gosh how good are we, we are the very testicles of the dog'. Walker has gone, so what? As I have proved using my brain, he didn't make a gnat's fart of difference in the last 7 games, except making is lose to West Ham - yeah I can do numpty as well!
The big stand out difference to our end of season squad is Wanyama. He played in 5 of those 6 wins. He was obviously not fit against the chavs and was not on the field yesterday. So, maybe Levy is to blame and he should have bought a backup for Wanyama? But who would that bloke be? None the 3 million players we have been linked with would fill those shoes.
So, I don't know, it could be Levy's fault, it could be that everything will be fine when Victor is back to his superb best, it could be that we have just had a slow start, we often do. One thing I do know, with no possibility of being wr..., wr..., less than correct is that is ain't down to Trippier and them numpties are extremely silly.
