ClemFandango
Lord High Chief of the Privvy
Founding Member
How in the fuck are we two down ?
Join one of the best Tottenham Hotspur Supporters forums on the interweb, Discuss the ins and outs of our great club with like minded spurs fans from around the world. Please note, if you are easily offended, this forum is not for you.
This is the worst I've seen Romero. He's all over the place.Agree, different game if Solanke is fit
IMO that wasn’t so much the high line as the fact that Bissouma was so deep as Maddison pressed Joelinton. Once he beat Maddison 1v1 he had 20 yards of space to run into and he could just pick his runner.This won’t be the first time this season we suffer these type of results.
Our high line will always get punished this way.
This won’t be the first time this season we suffer these type of results.
Our high line will always get punished this way.
Immense challenge from Dragusin there.
Positive change from Ange aswell
High line costs us more points. Embarrassing.
Two things:
1) We clearly have players that buy into the system. We played well and created more than enough chances to win that game comfortably.
2) You cannot press or have any kind of dominance of the ball without a high line at this level. It's less risky than allowing teams to run at your back four.
Overall, I'm baffled by people--mostly the Proper Football Men™ among the pundits--who act as if "Ange-ball" is some loony, radical approach to the game. Many, probably most, clubs around Europe and the PL press with a high line and use attacking FBs. There are things we do differently than most, and Ange does place a huge emphasis on pushing numbers forward, but not every bad result is proof that the system doesn't work. Unless that's what you want to see to begin with.
What was the toon gameplan ?Generally we did play well and deserved a result but Ange has to sort Romero out
Yes he puts in a few good tackles but he’s naive in his positional sense
You could argue that both goals conceded today were down to him
I want to see us win and do well playing attractive attacking football as should most of us
Continuing to give away goals like today is unacceptable anymore than persevering with Werner
Did nothing today when he came on so maybe try Moore?
Newcastle aren’t all that!
That's what I thought. Do they play a high line game against other teams ?Like most teams game plan against us, low block and counter.
With this press, you have to be all in & that includes the high line. You can't have a little bit of this, & little bit of that.Two things:
1) We clearly have players that buy into the system. We played well and created more than enough chances to win that game comfortably.
2) You cannot press or have any kind of dominance of the ball without a high line at this level. It's less risky than allowing teams to run at your back four.
Overall, I'm baffled by people--mostly the Proper Football Men™ among the pundits--who act as if "Ange-ball" is some loony, radical approach to the game. Many, probably most, clubs around Europe and the PL press with a high line and use attacking FBs. There are things we do differently than most, and Ange does place a huge emphasis on pushing numbers forward, but not every bad result is proof that the system doesn't work. Unless that's what you want to see to begin with.
With this press, you have to be all in & that includes the high line. You can't have a little bit of this, & little bit of that.
It's funny how those that seem to rage against the system the loudest are the one's that know the least about it.
4 points from 9 against poor opposition.At least we have 3 good performances under our built and one tricky away game out of the way. Let’s get a striker fit and see where we are after the NLD
Appreciate the stats but you're getting eerily close to ratings! Might trigger some.Our shot conversion is currently at 13.6 percent, which is 4th best in the league.
Not sure if this stat is any good
ManCity are at 13.7%, yet have scored 3 more goals and taken 23 more shots.
Glad I didn’t see the game today. Heard it sucked
I quite like Ali Golds ratings, quite honest and provide context. I usually agree with themAppreciate the stats but you're getting eerily close to ratings! Might trigger some.
My belief is that you assess the risk based on the careful assessment of the current game situation. We were all over them with 70% possession & being far more threatening. We were all over them so why not try to capitalize on our momentum? The likelihood of a breakthrough was far greater than receiving a sucker punch.Game management. At 1-1 and not long to go, how about protecting the point ?
We had no striker and the writing was on the wall. I didn't suggest closing up shop, just protect what you have.My belief is that you assess the risk based on the careful assessment of the current game situation. We were all over them with 70% possession & being far more threatening. We were all over them so why not try to capitalize on our momentum? The likelihood of a breakthrough was far greater than receiving a sucker punch.
By going for the win, we ended up losing one single point. But if we had won, we would have gained 2 more points as opposed to the status quo. I would go for the win under the same circumstances every time as it puts you further ahead.
Those late game winners last season were fantastic.
Did you object to those wins or did you celebrate them?
With your reasoning, we would not have won & with only a single point gained it would have left us further adrift of Top 4 & even out of Europa League.
God I despised the Conte & Mourinho eras for playing defensively & protecting a point for 90 mins.